Labels:book | reckoner | sky OCR: CONCLUSION The Court of Appeats' Amended Opinion should be affirmed on the merits of the qualified inmunity inquiry that reasonable officer could have believed Elder arrest be lawful, in light ot clearly established law and the information Holloway possessed In the event the Court goes beyond the merits, should affirm the Court of Appea!s' decision to place the uapinn of proof upon the plaintiff show clearly established law Finally, the Court Appeals decision standard review should be affirmed because the decision narrow one, within Court's discretion and resulting from invited error the alternative. if the decision interpreted nore broadly logical extension the burden af proof at clearly established ME[ resting with the plaintiff supported by Pierce, and is justified bs important pol- IC1 ...
(.png)
